Mumbai, addressed Apple India Private Limited’s application for renewing an earlier advance ruling on the classification of ...

CAAR Mumbai noted that the case bore strong similarities to the ruling by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate ...

Bombay High Court held that exercising extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India not ...

Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) examined whether the transportation services provided by the applicant, Tvl.

Annual Closing of Government Accounts – Transactions of Central / State Governments – Special Measures for the Current Financial Year (2024-25) All Government transactions done by agency banks for the ...

The move is expected to streamline trade settlements and reduce dependency on third-party currencies. The circular, issued under Sections 10 (4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA ...

The quantum of carry forward losses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. A breakdown of losses by specific categories. 3. Applicable time limits for utilizing these losses. 4. A statement specifying if ...

No tax is required to be deducted at source under Sec. 195, if the amount paid by resident Indian end-users to non-resident, ...

However, CAAR Mumbai examined the technical specifications and observed that similar classification issues had already been addressed in prior rulings. The authority referred to the case of M/s.

The court referred to multiple precedents that reinforced the necessity of these procedural elements. In V. Bhanoji Row Vs.

Citing legal provisions, CAAR Mumbai upheld its decision to reject the application, emphasizing that a ruling on the matter was already under judicial review. The case underscores the limitations of ...

In conclusion, CAAR Mumbai formally rejected the application and disposed of the case, underscoring that legal provisions prevent duplicate proceedings on the same issue. The decision highlights ...